Update: Since writing this post, we have published a hands-on review of Ryobi’s Auto Hammer - click here to check it out.
At first glance, Ryobi’s 12V ONE+ Auto Hammer closely resembles Craftsman’s 12V NEXTEC Lithium-ion powered Hammerhead Auto Hammer. Well, looking at the specs, the two cordless hammers are far more similar than they are different on the inside as well.
To start, both tools drive nails at 3600 beats per minute. LED work light? Of course. Magnetic nail-guide? Check. Retractable sleeve to allow for flush driving? Affirmative. Let’s not forget that both tools are claimed to capable of driving nails up to 3 1/2″ long.
So are there any differences between the two tools? Well, they are both compact and ergonomically designed, but the Ryobi appears to have a slightly slenderer head. Ryobi also claims a 1.5 lb weight compared to Craftsman’s 1.86 lbs.
Most obvious, of course, is the difference between battery geometries. No doubt both batteries must have similar capacities, but Ryobi’s creates a boxy sort of hilt at the base of the tool. Based on our experiences, we would probably prefer Ryobi’s battery shape over Craftsman’s inline NEXTEC battery style, but not everyone will share that sentiment.
The Ryobi is set to be released with a price of $90, while the Craftsman version is currently priced at $100. It might be safe to say that the Craftsman tool will likely drop to $90 or lower as the winter holiday shopping season approaches.
Due to the glaring similarities between the tools, it could very well be that they are manufactured by a common OEM. This would probably be disappointing news since the Craftsman Hammerhead has not received particularly warm reviews. One of the most common criticisms is that the tool is underpowered and that it falls too short of it’s 3 1/2″ nail driving claims.
Despite all this, we are actually eagerly awaiting the release of Ryobi’s Auto Hammer. What we’re hoping for is that 1) it blows the Craftsman Hammerhead out of the water, and that 2) it is the spearhead of a brand new expanded like of 12V ONE+ cordless tools.
Ultimately, though, there are still decent alternatives out there, such as pneumatic-powered palm nailers, and a good ol’ 16oz claw or framing hammer. (Edit: Rusty (via his comment) is right, a 22oz hammer would be better suited.)
We had previously covered both Ryobi’s Auto Hammer, and Craftsman’s Auto Hammer.
Ryobi Auto Hammer via Home Depot
Craftsman NEXTEC Auto Hammer via Sears
ToolGuyd Review of the Auto Hammer
9 Comments
16oz claw hammers? Why not the 22oz framing hammers? Do a lot better job with less effort.
You’re absolutely right, Rusty. Still, a cordless “auto” hammers is not intended to replace a 22oz framing hammer or similar, or at least I don’t see them filling that role anytime soon.
I have used Both and the Ryobi is better, lighter and drives a nail smoother. And $10 Cheaper, can’t beat that!!! GO HOME DEPOT !!!!
Lisa, would you mind sharing additional details about your experience with both tools?
i just use marijuana
yea they’re both pretty nice, but don’t hold a lick to a pneumatic one.
@ryan… okay, thanks for sharing that. Please refrain from using power tools when engaging in illegal drug activities, or when consuming alcoholic beverages.
@dan That is true, but these auto hammers are not intended to replace pneumatic nailers or palm nailers. Well, at least not the current first generation of cordless power hammers.
I work at home depot, and we had a vendor for ryobi come in and demo the ryobi auto hammer. And boy did it work! Wer were pounding 3 1/2″ framing nails into maple for about 3 hours until the battery. It’s a little loud, but definitly worth the hundred bucks. FIVER STARS!!!!
Tommy, as we saw over the course of our recent review, Ryobi’s Auto Hammer is definitely capable of driving 3-1/2″ nails. But for three hours straight? At that point I think my hands would have shaken loose.