Craftsman Premium Ratchets Hands-on Review

Craftsman Premium Grade Ratchets

Craftsman’s new premium ratchets feel great in-hand and perform exceptionally well. Their heads are as slim as Craftsman’s popular low-profile ratchets, with the 1/2″ being ever so slightly thinner.

The handles on these ratchets, reminiscent of  Craftsman’s CrossForce wrenches, are different than the round and flat styles that I’m used to. I was skeptical at first, but grew to love the new handle geometry. I am usually more a fan of textured/knurled and cushion-grip ratchets, but these handles changed all that.

As for the ratchet mechanism itself – buttery smooth. The ratchet head is completely sealed, and contains an 84-tooth mechanism for a 4.5° swing arc. Its ball detent is stiff, but not excessively so; sockets attach quickly and securely.

The only downside to these ratchets are their scarce in-store availability. You can order them online, but many stores (at least those near me) still aren’t carrying them. These ratchets also carry a premium price, atypical of Craftsman ratchets, but not outlandishly so.

These ratchets are highly recommended, although more casual wrenchers will find the price of Craftsman’s thin-profile ratchets easier on their wallets.

Craftsman Premium Grade Ratchets via Sears:
1/4″ Drive | 3/8″ Drive | 1/2″ Drive

And yes, they’re made in the USA!

Following is a brief photo gallery. Additional photos are on the way as soon as I can put together a lighting solution that works.

Thank you to Danaher for providing these samples without condition.

This entry was posted in Hand Tools, Made in USA, Mechanics' Tools, New Tools, Sockets & Drive Tools, Tool Reviews and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Craftsman Premium Ratchets Hands-on Review

  1. george says:

    probably just me but i don’t see the real need. i just never had issues with the older designs. does a 1/4 rathet really need it ? was a mech/tech for 40 years. but if it helps ya, go for it

  2. Stuart says:

    I happen to agree with you there – with a limited budget the 1/4″ would not be my first choice either. But, I like handle enough that I would probably want to complete the set. A 10%-off sale and $5 coupon would make the price a bit more manageable.

    The product packaging mentions that these ratchets have 25% fewer components than the Snap-on Dual 80 ratchet, so Craftsman is definitely targeting pro tool users with this design.

    These ratchets are also noticeable longer than most of my same-size ratchets, so their mechanisms are probably beefed up as well to handle the extra torque.

  3. Mac says:

    Yeah, to each his own I guess… Price piont way too high for moi, but they do sound nice.

  4. Andrew says:

    Stuart,

    When is the next 10% off sale? I might pick up a set at that time.

  5. Stuart says:

    Right now theres’s nothing on the schedule. If I had to guess, I’d say 2-3 weeks since there was one last weekend.

  6. Techniker says:

    I work as an automotive technician and I have been getting by with the regular Craftsman ratchets without a problem. I’ve been considering buying a new set from Snap-On, but now these are out, I think I will get them instead. I can think of a job right now they can be used on- the rear differential fill plug on a first generation Ford Explorer. Those can be hard to get at if you have a limited freedom of rotation. I really like Craftsman’s products.

    I wonder if a flex neck version will be coming out? Any idea, anyone?

    -Techniker

  7. Beaver says:

    Good review!

    I hope to pick up a set!

  8. Billy says:

    This is the path that craftsman should be on. I bought a 1/2 and I love it, it’s basically an exact copy of a Matco but a fraction of the price. It’s the kind of tool that makes you want to start disassembling something when its in your hand

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>