The Popular Science Total Inventor’s Manual, by Sean Michael Ragan, promises to help you Transform Your Idea Into a Top-Selling Product, offering advice in areas of Ideas, Prototyping, Funding, among others.
I first “met” Sean, the author, more than 5 and a half years ago, via email introduction. I was looking to expand my contributions with Make Magazine, where he was an editor.
Advertisement
Since then, we met once – at a Maker Faire, and although we haven’t been in frequent contact lately, I would consider him a friend. He was my editor for numerous assignments, both short reviews and long articles, and in a twist, there was one time where I was the editor and he the contributor.
Sean is clever, and has a way with words. It’s hard to describe, but it’s as if he can inject interest and even amusement in something that would ordinarily be routinely dull. Take group emails, for instance, such as those announcing a call for tool reviews. You get pulled in, not because the subject line is click-bait, but because it is lively.
I once came across brief meeting minutes in the Make Magazine online back end. I was an outsider with access to the blog software, looking in. I don’t remember much, aside from it being some basic routine stuff, like a once-a-week editorial group catch-up kind of thing. I distinctly remember thinking “Sean must have written that one!”
His writing captures interest, holds attention, and conveys necessary information.
With this in mind, I suppose I should not have been so surprised at how much I enjoyed his book.
Inventors reach out every so often, wanting to see their product shared about or reviewed on ToolGuyd. Emails and requests have increased in frequency, thanks to Kickstarter and other direct-to-user mediums. Or sometimes there are new tools or products from small companies that haven’t quite honed their marketing skills.
Advertisement
I communicate with people each month, sometimes as often as each week, who could benefit from a friendly voice passing along helpful information.
This is not a textbook. It’s as if the author is your friend, telling you it as it is.
Amazon has a short preview that I would encourage you to look at, but in the meantime, here are 2 sample pages taken from said preview:
The book has an almost magazine-style layout and presentation, and it works to its favor. There is lots of visual imagery, and the information is broken down into easily digestible chunks.
There are 4 main topic areas, including sections on brainstorming, sketching, prototyping, manufacturing, marketing, and others:
MAKE ONE [Top-Selling Product]: Get that great idea out of your brain and into the real world with a crash course in ideation, prototyping, and testing. Includes clever, can-do lessons in CAD, 3D-printing, laser-cutting, electronics, robotics, coding, and more.
SELL ONE [Top-Selling Product]: Whether you’re riding the Kickstarter wave or hitting the venture capital beat, get your idea funded—and protect it with a proper patent. Then learn to refine your prototype’s look and feel to give it a boost in the market.
MAKE MANY [Top-Selling Product]: Bring your invention to the masses with tips on manufacturing processes and best practices, plus solid advice for beginners on running a supply chain.
SELL MANY [Top-Selling Product]: You’ve built it—time to make them come. Discover how to effectively position your product in the marketplace, deal with consumer feedback, and run—or sell—your newly successful company.
While insightful and helpful, and choc full of information, it’s also interesting.
I particularly like page 188, “Pitch Your Product to Influencers,” Step 2: Make their jobs easy. Yep. It basically says that when pitching a product to bloggers, reviews, social media folks, etc., one should include clear images and a clear list of product features. It’s unfortunate how many times someone will ask me to write about their product and fail to provide me with information or visuals I need to even give fair consideration.
Sean has taught me a lot, much of the time without there being a question asked or advice sought.
I’m not looking to design or sell my own product, but there are a lot of people who are in this position. Even if you’re not, it’s an entertaining read, and everyone is sure to learn something.
The information, insights, and suggestions are enhanced with quick looks at prominent modern inventors, quick injections of knowledge, and appealing off-the-sketchpad illustrations.
I enjoyed this book. It’s an interesting read by an interesting person.
I have not read it cover to cover yet. I skimmed some sections in my first read, and went back a few times, repeating particularly interesting sections and covering some of the remaining ones. And I believe that’s how it’s meant to serve as a reference. You visit the sections you need, and come back to the other ones later.
You probably can read it front to back, and I imagine there are many first-time inventors and product creators who might benefit from doing so.
As mentioned, it’s not a comprehensive textbook. The author shares enough insight and information to steer you in the right direction. Perhaps it is best considered an introductory tour guide, one that reveals sights along a path into unfamiliar territory. You are given enough information to choose which paths to pursue with greater attention.
I cannot be sure that inventors or potential inventors will find the knowledge they seek in this book. Nor can I guarantee that you will definitely enjoy it. But I can tell you that I found new knowledge, and I found enjoyment. Of the parts that cross into my personal experiences and expertise, I found accuracy and agreement.
ISBN: 1681881586
Buy Now(via Amazon)
(The book is “Printed and Bound in Canada.”)
Disclosures and Question to Readers
Thank you to Sean for providing the review sample unconditionally.
Note: I would consider Sean a friend. Yes, a friend I would do a favor for, but this review is not intended as a favor. This review is as impartial as can be, with great attempts made to be objective and fair.
In high school, my English teacher’s friend wrote a book. She talked a little about it, I thought it was interesting, and bought a copy. It was so bad, I was never able to finish it. It was never clear to me if she personally recommended his book, or if she was simply trying to sell some copies. I don’t intend for you to have any such confusion.
I was offered a copy, and was glad to accept one. The book never arrived, so Sean sent one one personally. We never talked about whether it would be reviewed, where it would be reviewed, how it would be reviewed, or even if there would be mention anywhere at all.
There were no expectations, promises made, agreements, or really any discussion about a review of any kind.
I already briefly reviewed this book for Make Magazine, but it’s too good of a reference in my opinion, and as mentioned entertaining, that I would be remiss for not mentioning it here.
If you stand unclear about whether I can be impartial or not about this book, you can minimize any cloudiness by 1) examining the sample pages via Amazon to help gauge its informational value or interest to you, or 2) find it at a library (or request it) at no out of pocket cost to you.
Lastly, this was the first time I’ve been in this situation. It was difficult to determine how to approach it, so I sought to share more than I probably needed to. As a reader, how would you like to see me approach reviews or previews where a friend or friendlier-than-typical acquaintance is the author, inventor, or creator? I don’t expect it to happen again anytime soon, but who knows.
Max
Third paragraph; Did you mean friend instead of fiend?
Stuart
Ha! Yes, thanks.
One letter, huge difference in meaning.
firefly
It was intentional. They are no longer friend after the candid review 😀
Jotham McMillan
Stuart,
I have no problem with you reviewing products that your friends create. You let us know about your connection within the first couple paragraphs and that’s good enough for me.
I feel like you are quite up-front about any biases you might have and there’s no reason to beat it into the ground. Some folks who skim (instead of actually reading) will always criticize your reviews based on perceived bias. Please try and ignore them.
I appreciate your current review style and see no need for any changes.
P.S. I bought the book as I’m the intended audience and any kernel of wisdom I might get would make the purchase price well worth it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Koko the Talking Ape
“Lastly, this was the first time I’ve been in this situation. It was difficult to determine how to approach it, so I sought to share more than I probably needed to.”
I appreciate how hard you are trying to be open and fair. I understand the dilemma completely.
In your situation, a lot of social workers, psychologists, teachers, clergy, law enforcement officials, health care providers, and other people with heightened responsibility have decided, either personally or through professional codes of ethics, that a simplistic, blanket rule is the best, because it errs on the side of over-carefulness, and because it is easy to apply. Instead of requiring people, whether the provider or their bosses, to make a subtle, multivalent, context-specific decision in every case, they decide to make a simple, easy-to-apply law, to spare the care providers the work of deciding the principle individually.
In your case, the simple rule would be to refuse to review anything created by a friend, now in the future. It would not be the fairest rule, but it would be the simplest rule on the good side of “fair.” It would save you a lot of brain cells.
David R Zeller
That solution would also deny his readers of interesting information, especially as his contacts grow over time.
I much prefer the approach he has taken. Include a caveat, and keep your readers informed.
D.
Ron Kellis
David, I agree with you. A more than reasonable attempt was made at transparency.
I hope it follows that being in a field means you know others in the field. With some you may simply never quite get around to reviewing their “what-ever.” Some you may review with the approach you took.
I think both can be ethical.
fred
As humans we are often caught on a “slippery slope” trying to adhere to our own notion of ethical behavior and address what others might think or say about us. I think Stuart tries very hard to be open and fair with his readers – and applaud him even when his his angst-sharing with us borders on “too much information.”
Regarding the book itself: I can see why the author and Popular Science published it. There seems to be a wave of optimism about how individual inventiveness might be monetized into a big payday. This seems to be fueled by TV shows like Shark Tank and its spin offs and advertising by so-called inventor help companies with pitchmen like George Foreman. Even kids (or more likely their “backstage parents” are in on the act. ABC’s Toybox had kids as the “Sharks” – with the grand prize being a chance to have your invention sold at Toys R Us. I think this is good to the extent that it encourages the country to pursue technology and invention. I’m less enamored with some of its sillier, superficial and get-rich-quick aspects.
I also wonder, with this morning’s news of Toys R Us declaring bankruptcy (Bain Capital and KKR probably having milked them dry) – about how much the Toybox show’s grand prize is worth.
Stuart
I do think a case by case basis still works; I was more wondering about whether my disclosure was considered sufficient and satisfying.
There are a lot of content and product creators whose coverage and products could be shared, friends or not.
I have met a lot of good people over the years, as the direct result of ToolGuyd and my several magazine contributions and opportunities. Automatically blocking discussion of physical good created in part or whole by friends or friendly acquaintances would be hard to commit to.
Flyer
Stuart, your upfront disclosure was perfect. It’s normal to know more about something accomplished by a friend than by a stranger. And, in a way, it makes the review more legitimate when you know the person and their background.
Before the internet (yes, I know, the Stone Age) people relied on word of mouth. It was not uncommon for a friend to help spread the word for something worthy of recommendation. The internet just makes it easier to reach a larger audience now.
You’ve proven yourself to be as unbiased as possible here so I would expect that if a friend had something unworthy, you wouldn’t recommend it.
Keep going!
DAVID GALLAGHER
Koko,
Why do we have to make more rules? Stuart is simply offering us his opinion on various subjects he has chosen to comment on. For this particular subject, he knows the author and was upfront about this so the reader could form their own opinion. Based on the small amount of Stuart readings I have seen, he appears to speak his mind so I believe what he has said in the piece. I suspect that if he didn’t like the book, that he would not have written the piece at all which is ok with me as he said the author was his friend. My Stuart recommendation is that no soul searching needed, continue.
Stuart
Thanks David! But, Koko is a long-time commenter who is always polite, constructive, and helpful. Respectfully, reading his comment again, I see no aspect I need to be defended against, although I do appreciate the sentiment.
David R Zeller
That solution would also deny his readers of interesting information, especially as his contacts grow over time.
I much prefer the approach he has taken. Include a caveat, and keep your readers informed.
D.
BigDan
If your recommendation turns out to be a product push for a friend and costs people out of pocket then they will stop following your advice and look for a new tool site. So the risk was on you I’d argue, for presenting it as a good read. Next time I think you can simply say he’s a friend but you are objectively stating your professional opinion/review regardless of that connection.
Thanks for the referral looks like a fun read.